The more
more conservable somethings
to bond with the more others,
the more, with the less enough
I call Floves to my Keyset of LOVES that i use as brands for models that produce some apps that promote deep lovely actions in all the reduced scopes-flows of the Whole.
Flove.org is a (w)holistic (meta)theory. Love is its primer default, but it could produce a similar outcome taking another word as main.
This page and website just focuses in briefly introducing and justifying how do i model the whole keyset and its more practical apps, through the definition of the word Love itself as a (fuzzy) case.
My this upper ontology of lovely keywords-models-brands-floves are also parallel with the popular matters classification and the achademical fields that more focus in each of them. See more about my lovely theorizings for the broader flows-fields in the presentation slides.
Loves as flows peaks, ideal brands for apps.
| WHOLE | ||
| FLOW | LOVE | FIELDS |
| 1. Universal | Flove | ETITELEOLOGY |
| 2. Natural | Simplex | ONTOLOGY |
| Categorical | Fuzzy | LOGIC |
| Numerical | Purer | MATH |
| Dimensional | Polon | PHYSICS – Particle |
| 2.3.1. Material | Carbon | CHEMISTRY – Atom |
| Elemental | Soil | GEOLOGY -(Macro)Mol. |
| Lineal | Gene | VIROLOGY -Protoplasm |
| 3. Experiential | Channel | BIOLOGY -Cell..System |
| Emotional | Love | AXIOLOGY ..to macro… |
| Relational | Joy | SEMANTICS |
| Rational | Wisdom | EPISTEMOLOGY |
| 3.3.1 Personal | Souls | PSICOLOGY |
| Local | Trustful | ETHICS |
| Social | Free | SOCIOLOGY |
| 3.3.3…Economical | Chain | ECONOMY |
| 3.3.3….1 Extraccional | Eco | ECOLOGY |
| Manufactural | Craft | INDUSTRY |
| Servicial | Offer | MARKETING |
| 3.3.3….3.1 Gift | Freed | |
| Lend | Shareful | |
| Exchange | Deal | |
The keywords choosed for this upper ontology aim to be maximma supremum vertexes (achademical buzzdefinition…) by bringing maximum meaning and mininum learning curve and message length by integrating a balance between my own intention, popularity and science.
All these Flows & Loves are relative to each other: There is not Love overall if the lower flow is not lovely flown too. Their linear hierarchical display is useful for showcasing simplicity and for easily modelling and coherently entangling varied miniapps at – from each of the limited scopes – flows of the Whole:
Any lower lovely as best extended conservation of their upper loves in it
So it’s lovely to model – make the upper loves to flow within the lower flow, up to a simplexification like this:
Modelling examples: Fuzzy
Every design improves a theory, and every code develops a practice more
Some of the lovelies above are more modeled than others… Work in progress. The offer page shows one of the more practical models, that also has a more evolved web page showcasing it.
As an another example of a more abstract app model, see the following steps to get a further taste of the fuzzy bottom up model, a simplex distributed enriched polysemic thessaurus-dictionary:
- Say any word, formally andor informally (KEYWORD, i.e. Love).
- Find an antonym andor complementary for it (KEYPAIR, i.e. Truth)
- Merge (i.e. Dipedia for antonyms) & define them WISEly (with epistemologic labels i.e. Proposal), extend the family of your Keypair (KEYSET i.e. Floves) andor go to play a KEYAPP(s) (LOVES as categories in an F-Droid like platform, i.e. Trustful apps) that displays you a default inviting phrase (with the KEYWORD own childs forming it) to perform an action, where you could also edit such phrase (see Triads miniapp) and later save it andor send it (to a friend, network, etc).
Fuzzy Love
Problems, words andor relations shouldn’t resolve twice
The floves shown in this page above are one of the many possibles KEYSETS for the word «Love». LOVE is my choice for a default holist primer because i feel it the best discrete and more popular object to more simply get to the more (in)finitely deep and far. In more easy words: the target is to define Love in the more varied ways, reusing existant data as much as possible as well, for simplex living sake!
Debate, Adapt, Extend
Floves KEYSET can be further extended, like in this extended demonstration where i add further background and processing, for helping the apps modelling further. Also note that adding more words may decrease potential consensus in the set as well:
| BRIGHT+–> | FLOVE | <–SHADE- | ||||||
| Scope | Source | Evolution | Expression | Lovely | Far lovely | Excess | Tweak | |
| … | ||||||||
| Pasional | need | desire | want | Love | cute | zeal | rage | |
| … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | |
An interpretation that comes out of this extending:
Loves as Flows peaks, create lower flows too
-More love vibrates if less shadow and more upper loves vibrate (are conserved…) in it
-We cannot vibrate all brights in all scopes at the same time and this causes shadows to show off
-We have biases based in many personal and social issues but specially because of the mommentual shadow that the whole wants to redeem through us
-Bright goes to Love and that prints – forms bright sources in its lower scope
-The brighter source, the lesser shadow and the more possible evolution
-The brightest expression andor the least shadow lead us to the (far) loving expressions too. Otherwise, the twisted shadow will go to lack instead of just excess.
Download two more possible tabled (old, previous) extensions of this keyset, here
See more
-Read some poetic spoofed testimonials about this flove project, from past and actual very known people that were-are involved in related-similar projects.
-See an advanced use case of entangled apps (not recommended for newbies…)