Lovely manufacturing
WHY
Technological evolution is not rival of artisanship, we should always see it as rather empowering it. For creating the things we use for living and leisure, technical innovation may decrease actual needs of human labour while it is always also creating new oportunities of artisan labour in broader fields. Schumpeter threade more in this with his theory of the creative destruction of economical innovations within economy.
We should always value the human hand behind any artifact. So we could always have more and better models and information about how we humans involve in the making of anything.
We people also specialize in some development-crafting techniques more than others. These specialized task that aybody is more capable of doing than an average non specialized person are normally tasks that we like more doing than other tasks. But this shouldn’t be taken for granted, because at some point we would be liking doing more some easier tasks that everyone could be doing or tasks that we are not specialized but that we will have a higher preference doing it more.
The more love – preference we put for the task we do, regardless of our specialization in it, gives already a very important for the product itself. It could take you more hours to achieve the same as someone else more expert in it did, but if you have achieved a similar quality than him-her, we could say that your product is more valuebale than his-her, and not because of the more time you put, but because of the more love. Some people could consider this statement too mystic, and some others could justify it being every time more increasing with this argument: The overload of products and the more technically complex artifacts we are capable of making, are apparently increasing the gap between materiality and humanity, andbut since we humanity are also vanguardist materialities, the more material humanity – lovely intention is put into a material, the more vanguard lovely energy it will carry for the one using it afterwards.
Some metrics for artisanship will be helpful (a preference 1-5 rater will be its minimal expression), as they are also helpful for the previous mining ecology of the materials used for later crafting the product.
Metrics can be achieved in many different ways, i.e. by 1-5- ratings, with further extended replies, etc. Metrics can also be more trustworthy the more are backed for the more reliable people (either professionals on the matter andor other more directly trusted people from you).
Also, the overall plan of the production of an artifact is probably the best crafting property of it. So, moreover, if the plan plots to allow the more openly the more craftings in whichever of its production chain, the craftier.
WHAT
-Parameters for a main form and for different forms for crafting metrics
-Preference rater for Offers
–Crowdcrafting models
HOW
…