Dipedia, fuzzy antonyms conjunctions app

WHY

Dipoles links are the widest ones, dichotomies increase for expanding their own merging value

For positivizing anything looks better and easier to add andor multiply two numbers than multiply two negatives, but this second option adds more magic to the operation, right? Similarly happens with semantical sintaxis.

A disjunction is a big degree of an uncertain similarity in a conjunction

Dipedia wants to bring more peace to the world by easing how we all can see and take the road to the polarities centroids, andbut we haven’t develop enough tools for deeper dealing with what we very modernly and formally call conjuncted antagonists-antonyms.

Antonyms are very easy to find and when we conjunct them they display a total possible rational length to infinitely explore within the more minimal set.

Antonyms conjunctions bring a very intense middle, hence all of these conjunctions can be considered key pairs. However, formal logic forbids us to do so, calling them oxymorons with an authoritarian appeal to pitty fallacy. Dipedia dignifies them to highest level instead.

Similarly, adding two different rates within the same oppositional rater is a very normal doing in our daily life, i.e. I like you because of X and i dislike you because of Z. But we don’t have platforms implementing that very easy feature comfortably anywhere. Also in a similar sense, there is a untidy debate at wikipedia for how any page should be referring to its more antagonist page.

Kids, artists, poets and comedians love extending the degreeing of and within oxymoronia

Oxymorons are either useful for a big trivial andor the most formal experiences. This possible poling of big absurdity and wisdom is already oxymoronic…. which should be proof enough of their fundamental importance… .

With the word «Oppositional Keypair» we could avoid to use the word Oxymoron for propositivistic purposes, but it is rather better to keep Oxymoron as a synonim of it because it’s a very well known word already and also because its phonemics awake some fun in the ones of us that are open andor adore antonyms conjunctions. Furthermore, FoxyHolon is yet a more provocative possible synonim while more explicative too, although it may sound a better choice to use it for the naming of the other opposite conjunctions to the oxymoronic ones: The conjunctions between complementary words, which are harder and more dynamic to find than the opposite ones, hence why the word foxyholons could represent them very well.

WHAT

Exploring depth through redefining fuzzy antagonisms

Dipedia focus is to create, extend and aggregate redefinitions of merged-conjuncted oppositional relations, one type of key items within the fuzzy model.

We may find the Dipedia edge in the interpretation of «crime», probably the more formal word referring to a contradictory practice with some positive values, which Dipedia should rather try to conjunct and further define that conjuncted way…

HOW

Tell your more known antonyms-dichotomies-contradictions, merge them as bipoles (i.e. as AdjetivizedNoun) and extend them endlessly. Also, a wizard called Lao AI for example (honouring Lao Tzi) could be constantly be telling you about the polarities that are leaving apart in whatever you are expressing andor your positioning within an oppositional axis..

Dipedia beyond words

See more examples about how to extend the merging of oppositions within other expressive channels beyond words sintaxis. i.e. Conjunct-Merge an image which is contradictory to a text, etc.

Anticomms

Anticipating a popularly expected received interaction, offering it instead

You could ask a question to someone that was rather supposed to ask it to you. In some scenarios, it could bring a lot of fun. i.e.

-Say goodbye with the same tone as if you were saying Hello

-Enter in a bar. Ask a bartender what he wants to drink and keep telling him-her that he has to buy something to you or has to go from the bar

-…

AntiComms could be done more or less contradictory, very partial or loaded, better or worse transmitted as well. AntiComms feedbacks are going to need to recall in older former communication channels because their propositions overload the channel that were proposed to flow by… which opens a yet more interesting featuring and research… . For example, the bartender you ask for buying you something with words will have to reply to your words with his (older) facial language, etc