Floves

Universal fundamentals

Natural linguistics

Biological dimorphism

Rational

1. Personal being

2. Local trust

3. Social freedom

Economical

1. Ecology

2. Craft

3. Offer

3.1 Freed

3.2 Shareful

3.3 Swap

 

 

 

OVERVIEW

This page explains the making of this floves set (above, in spanish in the pics below), its benefits, possible extensions of it and whys about these keywords and orders, as justification and initial guide for modelling more practical apps.

For a more straight-through playing with all these floves see the viewer app introduction.

 

FLOVES MAKING OF

We can identify a limited set of layers (descriptive flows), where at each there will be a prescriptive expression (lovelies). i.e.

FLOVES
Flows Lovely
Universal Flove
Natural Real
Biological Vida
Emocion  
Pasion Amor
Cultura Alegria
Desarrollo Sabiduria
Razon  
Personal Almas
Local Confianza
Social Libertad
Economia Cadena
Extraer Ecologia
Manufactura Artesania
Servicio Oferta
Regalar Liberar
Prestar Compartir
Intercambiar Trocar

These limited lovely keywords are, semantically speaking, Maximma supremum vertexes.

These specific names are aimed to bring maximum meaning, mininum learning curve and message length by integrating parts of different vocabularies (common, scientific, key trends).

Triads are the simplest way to do the more practical taxonomies (bipoles are more useful for more abstract realms). Being strict with bipoles and triads ranks help doing analogies across different lists and define properties for lower items.

 

¿Hasta donde se puede llegar a expandir una vision y o un visor?

Cuanto más extendemos la visión, más consenso podremos perder, pero también, por otro lado, podemos alcanzar y ofrecer una comprensión más profunda de sus partes. Por ejemplo, podemos:

  1. Extender los ámbitos y sus amorosidades en diferentes formas (descripcion de fundamentales ontologicas, explicacion justificadora general: esta, diferenciacion de abstractos y practicos, etc)
  2. Añadir una palabra complementaria a la expresion amorosa ya propuesta (ejemplo: far lovely) (puede que así encontremos las o uno de los tipos de relaciones semanticas mas complementarias posibles…).
  3. Añadir dos tríadas adicionales mas suaves (una complementaria y otra mas antagonista) a las amorosidades para ayudarnos a comprender de cerca cada una de las expresiones y todo el proceso. Ejemplo:

 

BRILLO+–>

FLOVE

<–SOMBRA-

Ambito

Fuente

Evolucion

Expresion

Lovely

Far lovely

Exceso

Torcedura

Falta

Pasional

need

desire

want

love

cute

zeal

rage

fear

Etc…

 

Estas adiciones nos proponen definiciones automaticas para cada palabra mas extensos y axiomas estructurales mas claros:

-Se vibra más amorosidad si menos sombra y mas amorosidades superiores vibran

-No podemos vibrar todo lo brillante en todas las dimensiones a la vez y esto hace que haya sombras

-Tenemos manías basadas en nuestro género, historia personal, influencias culturales y sociales, y más especialmente en la sombra actual que vemos que no se redime en nuestro entorno.

-Brillante va a amorosidad, y deja una huella forma fuentes brillantes en su capa inferior.

-Cuanto más brillante sea la fuente, menos sombra de falta y más posible evolución.

-Cuanto más brillante sea la evolución, menor será la sombra torcida y mas posible la mayor expresión.

-La expresión más brillante, va con la sombra menos excesiva y nos lleva a las expresiones más amorosas posibles. De lo contrario, la sombra retorcida irá hacia la falta en lugar de ir al exceso.  

Linearmente hablando:

Lo femenino es lo primario en cada diada, y lo segundo en las triadas

Lo masculino es lo complementario en la diada, y lo tercero en la triada

 

* An old more extended linear grid, here

 

FLOVES KEYWORDS JUSTIFICATIONS

Vida es el mejor empezador unico posible aunque lo primero que vi(vimos) de Todo fuera Mundo

UNIQUE BEGINEERS

TAO

YIN

YAN

TAO

WHOLE

Universe

Multiverse

YIN

Everything

LIFE

Cosmos

YAN

Reality

Nature

WORLD

 

Todo no nos dice nada sobre lo que contiene. Tao seria mejor agrupador porque nos dice que contiene YinYan. Ambas nos sirven para entender una «caja». Pero Tao por si solo, solo nos dice que contiene una bipolaridad en el. Para darle algo mas de significancia al «intocable» Tao, habría que definirle dos polaridades mas tocables, y la que consideremos como primaria de las dos, puede ser un mejor empezador que la otra.

La elección del empezador ontológico (primeros sinonimos del innombrable-inconocible Todo, Tao, Etc) es muy determinante porque esta va a afectar-enfocar a todas las relaciones contenidas (ahijadas) en ello.

Podemos elegir «Vida» por ser suficiente conocido y por lo expuesto en el paragrafo y tablas de arriba y siguientes, si es que no queremos mas arriesgadamente (por poco conocido) elegir al mas fuerte de Flove (como muestra la primera tabla de esta pagina y esta otra justificacion).

LIFE

COMMUNICATION

 

FORM

INFORMATION

SEMIOTIC

DARK

Amorph

Unknowable

Stuff

PARTICLE

Form

Very unknown

Noise

MATTER

Non-sintient

Quite unknown

Vibration

BIOLOGY

Sintient

Much unknown

Signal

PLANT

Sensual

Barely known

Code

ANIMAL

Sexual

Natural language

Sign

HUMAN

Soul

Processed language

Symbol

A mechanism with life, or a life mechanism, and then simplier: the Whole as a Life, since from an holistic point of view it is very incoherent to say: We live in a hyperconnected mechanism (or motion, process or world) that is not alive.

Formamos parte de un Todo que tiene un mecanismo que nos entrelaza mas alla de nuestros cuerpos visibles. Como no podemos estar entrelazados a algo no vivo, formar parte de un mecanismo con vida (o «la Vida») parece mas coherente que el decir que somos Vida que formamos parte de un movimiento o mecanicismo inerte.

La unica cosa que necesitamos para estabilizar este enlace es una minima taxonomia de los diferentes tipos de expresiones de la vida. Parecida cuestión pasa al calificar lo que es la informacion o el lenguaje (Ver tabla arriba para encaje de estos debates).

Al aceptar-adaptarse a que la mecánica de la planta naturaleza está viva, diréctamente notamos que nuestra bioquímica se alegra, porqué “Vida” o “mecanismo vital natural y-o universal” nos ofrece mas interactuación con la naturaleza (invisible a nuestros ojos) que “Mecanismo a secas” (o universo, todo, mundo o cosmos).

 

Aunque los rangos en las listas sean relativos, la lineariedad ayuda.

Tendemos a llamar al todo como «el universo». Pero este universo que decimos para representar » el todo » no es solo » un verso », ya está compuesto por dos elementos:

  1. Universo no observable
  2. Universo observable (naturaleza)

Con Universo y Naturaleza tenemos una diada primaria (que también podríamos fusionar en una constante: naturaleza universal y o universo natural), que tiene en ella «también» un tercer componente necesario: lo observador:

  1. Universo
  2. Naturaleza
  3. Observador (Biologia)

Estas palabras tienen mucha estetica descriptiva. A continuacion anhadimos companheras prescriptivas:

Ambitos

Amorosos

Universal

Flove

Natural

Real

Biologico

Humanada

 

Chequeo de consenso de la complementariedad del conjunto y orden propuesto:

  1. El flujo universal tiene una realidad natural que es la humanada biológica
  2. La humanada biológica de una realidad natural en el flujo universal
  3. La realidad natural es una humanada biológica del flujo universal
  4. Retorcido: El flujo natural de la realidad biológica es la humanada universal

 

 

Racionalidad economica

¿La persona gobierna o es la sociedad el gobernante? Ambos, en perfecta simultaneidad confluyente.

Linear: Personal > Local> Social  

Personas mas desarrolladas con plenitud de comunidades cercanas sienten menos la autoridad de las normas sociales y o sentiran querer desarrollar equivalentes libertades (sociales) para todos. Inciso: Sino, llevado al extremo (sin incluir su polo social), se cae en el solipsismo.

 

Complementario: Social→ Local → Personal

Somos el conjunto de mentes humanas las que permitimos el desarrollo personal y local, al desarrollar el razonamiento sobre la mas abstracta convivencia comun en el entorno (lo social)… de lo contrario, una persona muy personal podria imponerse ante el resto, o los intereses de un pequeño grupo local podrian imponerse como norma para toda la sociedad.

Inciso: El abuso con Social (=Todo) > Natural, desarrolla constructivismos antievolucionistas…

 

Economia

Linear: Extraction> Manufacturing> Offer

Material things are taken, then further elaborated for taking advantages of their use and or for being offered to others to gain something from them with it. 

The final satisfactory use of the thing is not only positive because it is used in itself, but because encourages the relations in the production chain to thrive. Things are not infinite, some are very scarce. Every production chain, as the trophic chain themselves, has a critical sustainability point, specially at its extraction origins.

If an offer has a high degree of ecology and crafting, it will easier dignify the production chain through the offer, because the production chain will be more sustainable. Consumerism only becomes a problem when we consume by evading greater reasoning about how much we need that, or if we consume things that harm us as people or society. The consumerism of ecological and craft things is something lovely to promote worrilessly.

 

Gift > Loan> Exchange

We gift or loan if we calculate a better relational outcome than the possible future scarcity it will bring

Most of our economic activity is based on the gift and the loan. We are constantly giving away ideas and lending things. When we lend and give away appropriately we avoid the stress for reaching an material equivalence given in exchange. This improves the relation by itself but it can also spoil it.

Exchange tends naturally to barter (am exchange practice closer to the loan). Lending tends to share (a practice close to the gift). Gifting gives more possibilities of active use and ease of equivalence than the loan and lending gives more possibilities of active use than the exchange, simply because the material equivalence need is lower (a gift or loan is cheaper than an exchange).

Everytime we offer to loan or gift instead of exchange, we are doubting whether we are acting strategically and adequately well with respect to our forecasts of future shortages of what we are giving off. This is why for many people the loan seems more cumbersome than an exchange, or why we hesitate not to give and we decided to just lend. These tactical decisions are also the explanation for why there are more lovely trade-offs in some exchanges than in some gifts or loans, as well as there are loans that provide more loveliness than some gifts.  

Every offering suits a short term need, but it is also framed within an offeror mid-long term strategy

Giving, lending and exchanging are three areas that are directly relative to each other. When we think about exchanging, the vibration-pressure of (rather..) lending or giving it instead of exchanging is somewhat there. The vibration of a need of exchange is less as the offeror has more fulfilled his-her own basic needs and or the relational (inmaterial) outcome could be better than the material one itself.   

For the lender, a lending is an investment for a short term inmaterial benefit and a mid-long term material one, because his-her borrower will be tempted to lend back accordingly later if the offeror needs it in the mid-long term, and overload the inmaterial equivalence pole in the short term, just because (s)he is freer to have to give the equivalence of the material one. The recipient of a loan does not necessarily need to show strong thanks in response to match or pass the equivalence, but he will try to reach the line of equivalence to its borrower with the rational values (s)he possesses, i.e. at least show sufficient rational gratitude or make an effort in not being disgusting to him-her.

A borrower doesn’t need to be a lender to his-her borrower afterwards, but (s)he will be inmaterially very pressed for that, hence the potential benefit mid-long term for the original borrower.   

 

 

Debate, Adapt, Extend

Note: Links below point to an extinct wiki. If you wish to see what was there, copy the urls and check them through the WayBackMachine service from archive.org

 

This life view with floves in it is easier to debat, adapt and extend than others

 

This life view is easy to debate because:

It is appliable:

  1. View this default one and develop yours
  2. The mental effort to do so is low, pleasant and worthy
  3. It can-should be further implemented – tested

It is accessible:

  1. It has well known and very abstract keywords with specified semantics for phrasing
  2. It has a high acceptability potential and it doesn’t have a critical mass for that
  3. Dynamic commenting: Agree, ignore or modify. Rate, rant or even vote it partially

It is limited:

  1. Has a minimum expression and it is scalable but the more you expand it, the less additional meaningffulness it brings
  2. Brings hermeneutic metrics for reviewing past, present and future events
  3. Relies in axioms, other trascendences and faith expresses the remaining

 

 

This life view is easy to adapt because:

Can be viewed in simpler views:

  1. Basic views i.e. Life set: resumed default, Basic life: simplified default, flove formula
  2. Partial views i.e. using only some parts of it: gender into dimensions
  3. Other views i.e. use other life views instead

You can add coats:

  1. Translations i.e. Languages, gurmukhi, binary, HASH, etc
  2. Sensorial, hormonal, neuronal, etc expressions
    1. Pictured i.e. colours [1], etc
    2. Multimedia i.e. dance: life qi, sounds: life piano, etc
    3. Other i.e. touch: Massage the darks as in acupuncture, etc
  3. Other aesthetics
    1. Lexic games i.e. cut-up theory, transpoetrics, etc
    2. Other cultures semiotics i.e. animals, art, signs
    3. Add gradients i.e. brighter, lovelier, more idealist, antagonist, gaming, etc to a new word, a partial set or to the full one

You can further define any part by adding:

  1. Copies
  2. External vibrations
  3. Paths to family and others (see family phrases, phrasing)

 

 

The life view can be easily extended because:

It can have further triads (or analogies) for:

  1. Process, ranks and parts
  2. Dimensions i.e. exchange
  3. Vibrations i.e. lovely childs, external vibrations, Life32

It can be networked by:

  1. Comparing personal views i.e. life viewer end, etc
  2. Crowdsourcing this and your own view i.e. see crowdlife
  3. Using it for a local or social purpose i.e. minimum of 50% of flove or life view matching in order to..

It has a lot to improve by extending:

  1. Transcendence i.e. axioms, etiology, talks and faith
  2. Heuristic
    1. Hermeneutic i.e. improve metrics
    2. Modelling (improve the mindmaps
    3. Implementations i.e. improve flove.org, liberada.net, etc
  3. Format
    1. Documentation i.e. whitepaper, wiki, news
    2. Interactivity i.e. API, apps, services
    3. Architecture i.e. make it more decentralised

See more
* An old more extended linear grid,here

* A multi 3×3 squared grid of main concepts with more relative-looking rankings, here

* Upper floves extended in a Simplex 123+×Knuth^ Square: