Teleologies & Morals:
Dipedia intentionality:
Other analogies:
| I | GRASSMAN | PAULI (Jung just messed it up) | ||||||||
| MATCH | Equal | Energy conservation | ||||||||
| ME NOW | POLE | Continuous | Discrete | Causality | Synchronicity | |||||
| TRIVIAL | Distinct | Space-time continuum | ||||||||
A concentrated dissipating freedom will for looking for paradigms and ruptures is similar to a free will
| INTEGRATIVE | RUPTURISM | ||
| COMPATIBILISTIC | ANTIDETERMINIST | INDETERMINISM | |
| TELEOLOGY | Morally responsible | Pandeistic Nihilist | Chaotic Bias |
| Fine | RandomFatal | Experimental | |
| LOGIC | Ockham simplifiability | Absolutism | Bayesian probability |
| Inclusive | Excluded | Exclusive | |
| PHYLOSOPHY | Indirect realistic | AntiRealism | Realism |
| Emergent | Creation | Intervention | |
| GAME THEORY | Nash Equilibria | Choice Axiom | Pseudorandom estrategy |
| Move | Option | Selection | |
| PSICHOLOGY | Perceptual Control | Cognitivist Neuroscience | Parapsicological Psychiatry |
| Manage | React | Feel | |
| FINE INTEGRATIVE | |
| UNICITY | PAIRING |
| Energy | Conservating |
| Information | Replicating |
| Hidrogen | Bonding |
| Protein | Folding |
| Mitosis | Conjugating |
| Meiosis | Duplicating |
| Sexual | Mating |
| Paradigm | Conjuncting |
| Semantics | Antonym |
| Logic | Contradiction |
| Psychology | Dislike |
| Morals | Worse |
| Informal law | Sin |
| Formal law | Crime |
| Military | War |
| INTEGRATIVE | RUPTURE |
| Lejano | Opuesto |
| Compañia | Rival |
| Unido | Adversario |
| Fundido | Enemigo |
| Minimización | Eliminacion |
| Inclusion | Exclusion |
| Complementario | Contrario |
| Polaridad | Contrariedad |
| Relacion | Contradiccion |
| Coincidencia | Paradoja |
| Confluencia | Dilema |
| Simultaneidad | Dicotomia |
| Relatividad | Dualidad |
| Binomio | Diada |
| Bipolo | Dipolo |
| Par | |
| Pareja | |
| Nexo |
| COMPATIBILISTIC BELIEFS | BIAS | |||
| Determinism | Uncertainity | Freedom | Holism | |
| X | Monotheism | |||
| X | X | |||
| X | X | X | ||
| X | ||||
| X | X | |||
| X | ||||
| X | ||||
| X | X | Panpsychism | ||
| X | X | X | ||
| X | X | |||
| X | X | |||
| X | X | |||
| X | X | Weak compatibilism | ||
| X | X | X | ||
| X | X | |||
| X | X | X | X | Strong Compatibilism |
| TELEOLOGIES | BIAS (in techjargon) | |||
| Ideal | Experimental | Abandoned | Fatal | |
| X | Wannabe | |||
| X | X | Lammer | ||
| X | X | X | Geek | |
| X | X | X | X | Hacker |
| X | X | Lurker | ||
| X | X | X | Bloater | |
| X | X | X | Bundler | |
| X | X | Flamer | ||
| X | X | Nerd | ||
| X | X | X | Troll | |
| X | X | HolyWar | ||
| X | X | Hater | ||
| X | Cracker | |||
| X | HoneyPot | |||
| X | Script kidie | |||
Teleologies applied to cosmovision with oppositional trends narratives
| A QUATERNARY COSMOVISION | ||||
| ENDO | EXO | |||
| Very centric | Centric | Peripheral | Very peripheral | |
| Endo | Oneself | Human | Biology | Earth |
| Exo | Null | Alien | Sun | Great Attractor |
Macroscopic (bigness) referrals can be due to size as the sun and because of complexity as we are
| PROPOSITIVE | OPPOSITION | ||||
| IDEALISM | MATERIALISM | ||||
| Endocentrism | Exocentrism | AntiEndocentric | AntiExocentric | ||
| TE LE O LO GI ES | FINE | We always One | Anthropocentrism | We Being tricked | Death don’t exist |
| EXPERIMENTAL | Flove.org Army | AIencentrism | Very fragile | Stoned speciation | |
| ABANDONED | We firefigthing | Aliencentrism | Aliens are better | We the saviours | |
| FATAL | Best Predators | Viruscentrism | We are slaves | Succeed or suffer | |
| Mixed i.e. EAF | Dont have kids! | Absurdcentrism | Spiritual wankers | Idiocy will rule | |
1. LOW & ANTIEXOCENTRISMis not propositional
Greater terrestrial predators is against the possibility of benevolence in us and the creation
It is a contradiction to despise the cigarette butt that gave so much pleasure not long time ago
A Way Out: Although I have killed more than 4 suns we have kissed and watered many more stars
2. LOW ENDOCENTRISM
Not enough endocentric. i.e. Adam Apollo theory takes a geocentric side (and not a pluriperspectival one) as a Coordinate System center. Earth after or before the atom, but not after us, doesn’t consider our actual beings and sensings as a possible scale from an ancestor observation begining. Its Perception backwards model needs to have arrows to silentiate remembering also, as it has them for eliminating future probabilities.
Too antiexocentric. CTMU theory adds why pseudoempiric heuristics matter but doesn’t categorizes them.
2.1. ANTI-ENDOCENTRISM
Not propositional (too EliminativistCentric): Static (excluded middle) thruth-based models, despite much aesthetic effort put to it, excludes any possibility of a formal definition for the ultimate Being to reveal all beings with a logically definable causality with regularity. This tells why nihilism is unavoidable both in clasical science and metaphysics where the root of a hierarchy of all beings has to be labeled with a NULL value (i.e. void, vacuum, non-alive motion, even collapse). – Wen-ran Zhang (Freely edited by me)
Lazy oppositional (Arrogant ‘Antiquacking’): -… Even assuming the results are valid, they tend to discredit homeopathy, not support it… Homeopathy is a system of clinical treatment that can only be validated by in vivo clinical trials. Harriet A. Hall about this: –I can’t say that homeopathy is right in everything. What I can say now is that the high dilutions are right. High dilutions of something are not nothing. They are water structures which mimic the original molecules. We find that with DNA, we cannot work at the extremely high dilutions used in homeopathy; we cannot go further than a 10−18 dilution, or we lose the signal. But even at 10−18, you can calculate that there is not a single molecule of DNA left. And yet we detect a signal (– Montaignier), memory of nanoestrutures of water, linked to wet brain (Goertzel, Penrose Hammerhoff). Cancer transmission by tissues not by mutations (Massague), milions of nucleotides apart of dna ones, plants keep memory about stresses in nucleus.
Teleologies & Social paradigm linear evolution(Very Experimental, poor):
| TELEOLOGY | FIDEISM | PARADIGM | AntiEndocentric | AntiExocentric | |
| = | Fine | Pantheism | Essence | Being tricked | Death don’t exist |
| Physicalism | Substance | ||||
| + | Experimental | Politheism | Novelty | Very fragile | Stoned speciation |
| Paganism | Totems | ||||
| Panpsychism | Humanity | ||||
| 1 | Fatal | Monotheism | Dominance | We are slaves | Succeed or suffer |
| 0 | Abandoned | Pandeism | Knowledge | Aliens are better | We the saviours |
| Gnosticism | Inteligence | ||||
| Modernism | Technology | ||||
| Positivism | Science |
| Paradigm | Struggle | Simbology | |
| …Ape | Dominance | Survival | Basic |
| Hunter-gatherer | Coalitions | Tribal | Body-Oral |
| Sapiens | Groups | Power | Written |
| …Egypt | Emperor | Death | Complex |
| Pre-Socratics | Animism | Existence | Simplifications |
| Socratics | Virtue | Governance | Formal |
| Rome | Law | Justice | Pragmatical |
| Medieval | Theism | Science | Spiritual |
| Renacimento | Nature | Knowledge | Spectacular |
| Ilustracion | Society | Rationalism | Redemptional |
| Industrialidad | Mass | Product | Practical |
| Postmodernidad | Marketing | Currency | Digital |