CLAUSES DEVELOMENT

This page shows posible developments of the actual default clauses

 

1. EXTENDED SUBCLAUSES

ATITUDE : ASPECT:	Autoritarian	Conservative	Pragmatic	Interested	Libertarian
Destinatarias	close	near	known	granted	anyone
		asociates		equivalent
		that are
		that behave
		thematic
Purposes	common	aproved	beneficial	improvement	anything
	see profile
Giving	contribution	lend me	lend	re-lend	comment
	at canceling	much	equivalent	symbolic	in web
	total			patrimonial	with foto
	contact+
	buy it in x time
Time / Space	use with me	use where it is	back after use	back on request	Keep it
	chat me

 

We could further extend the chosing of clauses to be shown to advertisers by:

2.1. Hints attached to the clauses

2.2. Other categories of basic clauses, or in other more thematic forms: See documents at: wow.wiki.yt/en/Shareful

Also, more agilily, we could ask the offerors and requesters to describe their clauses in their user profile:

2.4. Choose your common clauses for all things.

2.5. Without clauses, only exposing a preferred method of dispute resolution for any matter. Example:

More less

Future – Current – Past

Experience – Use – Offer

With:

Similar – Different

Invitations – Things – Relationships – Disputes

 

3. DEVELOPMENT OF SUGGESTED CLAUSES

«One person, one clause or his license»

«Depending on who it is, I would lend with some specific conditions»

«Relationships help us grow, things help us to grow relationships»

The relationship recommends a type of offer-license or specific clause because the system would analyze:

1. The relationship (potential trust of the borrower with the applicant)

2. The current situation of the bidder (need to «not have to» exchange)

 

3.1. License suggestion for the offeror

To more and better analyze the offeror, better suggestions of offers with specific licenses can be proposed. Suggest concrete conditions helps the offeror to overcome the doubt that specific conditions to choose.

 

3.2. Suggestions of licenses for the applicant

When analyzing the relationship and potential relationship that a requester has, the clauses can be proposed to the requester, instead of «only» to the offeror.

Thus, the clauses would be found first by the requester, and so the offeror would not need to worry about having to think about what restrictions to start putting. The requester would propose those recommended clauses (or others that she would like to add to the suggested ones), with which she would have more options for use.

 

3.2.1 Suggestion of request messages

When developing analogies between the clauses with certain psychological archetypes, request messages can be suggested to the requester, so that with them he can more easily convince the offeror to lend him the thing he offers.

 

 

 

4. DEFAULT CLAUSES

4.1. The more restrictive clauses for protecting the offeror

4.2. The more neutral or customized ones

If we add the analogy with the categories of our imagined archetypal base community to the Attitude / Aspects clauses categories. That is to say, the Aspects are those of the Body of our Characters: Mari Puri, Juanito, Uxia and Encarna. And those of Attitude are said Bodies incarnating in the soul of another.

The way we behave with things says things about the way we are and vice versa

You are quite Mari Puri and you tend to Uxía… See how Encarna you are

You tend to share with Mari Puri’s soul in Juanito’s body

Analogizing the categories of the clause table (Attitude / Aspect) with its more humanized sister categories (Souls / Bodies) reveals several options where each Body represents its own Soul.  The joint options (a diagonal line), we could consider them as the universal clauses by default, from where any applicant and bidder can begin to have the fullest possible conversation about the possible end use of the thing or not. The diagonal lines of clauses would form these universal licenses.

 

ATITUDE : ASPECT:	Autoritarian Cram	Conservative MariPuri	Pragmatic Juanito	Interested Uxia	Libertarian Encarna
Destination MariPuri	close	near	known	granted	anyone
Purposes Juanito	common	approved	beneficial	improvement	anything
Giving Uxia	contribution	lend me	lend	re-lend	comment
Time / Space Encarna	use it with me	use it where it is	back after use	back on request	keep it

 

 

CASE: For near and beneficial purposes that re-lend and keep it.

Anyway, another useful way for another recommendation of universal clauses or default would be «pay attention to the clauses proposed by Juanito»:

 

CASE: For known with benefitial purposes who also lend and return it after use.

 

 

 

3.3.1 OTHER ANALOGIES

Persona.		ALMA:	Cram	Mari Puri
	Rescher	PREFIERO:	Verdad	Precisión
CUERPO:	DESEO:	ACTITUD : ASPECTO:	Autoridad	Conserva
Mari Puri	Influencia	Destinada	cercanas	afines
Juanito	Poder	Propósitos	comunes	aprobados
Uxia	Prestigio	Aportar	contribución	préstame
Encarna	Enriqueza	Tiempo / Espacio	úsala conmigo	usala donde está

We have chosen a Rescher ontology where we recognize a very clear analogy between their categories and ours. We believe that by analogizing the categories of his theory of «identifying which is the concrete Desire of inherent rational evolution in each Aspect and the Preference of concrete expression of the same» we complement the Personality of our Characters.

As with Rescher’s ontology, we can add more personality traits to our characters coming from other theories with categories of 2, 3, 4 and 5 elements, so we will test if our categories are correct, if it were easy (logical … ) to draw analogies of all other categories with them.When looking for analogies of our categories with other categories of other authors, we are evaluating how related are the concepts of their lists of 3, 4 and 5 categories with our lists of 3, 4 and 5 categories.

For example, as we have done in the table above:

-We have 5 bots that have an adjective that defines their personality.

-We compare the 5 Attitudes of our Characters with the 5 categories of another theory.

-If we think there is an obvious relationship, we add the categories of other authors as analogies of personality traits to our Characters.

See more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-factor_models_of_personality#Table_of_theories_and_instruments_using_extroversion_and_people-task-orientation

 

 

5. AUTOMATION OF ACCEPTANCE

5.1. Access by pre-established confidence

In this network, they say that grandparents and mothers share everything with their children

See more: MyFamily

 

5.2. Access by acceptance

Press a button that allows you to use the thing without having to ask for more permission

See more: Slock.it

 

5.3. Universal access

We give everything to the NOS user because she has everything. Everything is shareable, for now there are few hours to do in the factories needed for everyone to have everything, because you rarely have to wait for something to use something

See more: Venus Project (Zeitgeist)