Viewer

VIEWER (Projected app)

Nest/Describe your own Full View

WHY: As more words you order in a estructure with an automated process, the more you can view your whole view, I.e. how to get to another vibration from some vibrations i.e. how to get to «feel» when you are in a «worry».

Also, The collective results from all views would be the truest life view, while results within a group could also be interpreted as their (own tactical) collective life view.

There are sets of words which their ranks get to a stable point. This doesn’t deny their relativity, this just confirms fine-tunning. These default values are the Floves, a proposed set of default words, to agree to and or to fork them on.

WHAT: Nest groups of concepts, order a broader view of the whole. Get interpretations of your view, build common views.

Rank triads in podiums, for later contrasting your views with default views and views from others:

  1. Choose: Whole, Life, World
  2. Which is the lovelier order for you for these words: Love, Wisdom, Joy
  3. Do the same to the rational flow: Social, Local, Personal
  4. To offer flow: Exchange, Gift, Lend
  5. Economical flow: Extraction, Offer, Manufacture

HOW: Once you end the basic test, you could see you basic life view and have an analised comparison with the default view. Since all views are equally true (see Relatividad jerarquica), this comparison is not about if you are right or have scored more points, it just should bring you some more insight about the perspective of your view. Your own view (which probably doesn’t match with the offered default) is just a tactical view which is perfectly possible and not less accurate than the default one.

If we can identify some recurrent twist in anyone’s life view (i.e. he is putting 3rds as seconds against the default view, etc) we can also adapt-customize the language to the person, i.e. suggesting them further 3rds as seconds for reinforcement, or suggest him-her some (re)balancing temptation, in some case even by the over-reinforcement of trying to cause in him a equilibrating need by increasing such disruptance or overflow (and or at least as a thought experiment to magnify the ‘gap’ to see it better).

 

 

Demonstration

[quiz_test id=’1794′]

 

[quiz_test id=’1795′]

 

 

[quiz_test id=’1793′]

[quiz_test id=’1802′]

 

 

[quiz_test id=’1796′]

 

 

Development

 

 

More triads (See a manual full view)

 

 

Results pages could serve for

*Gather ideas about models:

 

*Apps launchers:

 

 

 

 

* Free analysis of choice:

 

Once you end the basic test, you could see you basic life view and have an analised comparison with the default view. Since all views are equally true, this comparison should bring you some more insight about the perspective of your view. Your own view (which probably doesn’t match with the offered default) is just a tactical view which is perfectly possible and not less accurate than the default one (See more: Axiologies).

If we can identify some recurrent twist in anyone’s life view (i.e. he is putting 3rds as seconds against the default view, etc) we can also adapt-customize the language to the person, i.e. suggesting them further 3rds as seconds for:

  1. Reinforcement
  2. Equilibrating temptation: Trying to cause in him a equilibrating need by increasing such disruptance or overflow.

Why a Life view?

Why this life view?