Categorías
Reviews

Review of a standalone Offers implementation

One flove scope is to improve the culture of lending for people sharing better and more their things (see the shareful page).

We know that a priority is developing a higher layer (more personal, local and social love in it) and not developing at the lower layer that lending is, but we also need lovely lending to be developed too, and that is one of the easiest layers (or loveliness) target to develop, compared to other more difficult ones from above.

For example, we consider lovely for the lending layer to have some standard conditions for sharing a thing (a kind of creative commons project for physical things). There is not any platform doing this, so flove goes for it. We first did a minimal module and a theme for a centralised but popular free software platform  (wordpress).  

 

LEARNING EXPERIENCE

We offered people a virtual platform with features that facilitate the description of conditions for sharing real things, but we realized that doing such an stand-alone effort didn’t produce the more sharefulness what we wanted. Nevertheless, these are not fresh news, this is the no-integral trend that most, if not all, projects fail into. It doesn’t matter how flashy or full is a platform that let anyone to choose conditions for sharing more securely something. People would still mind more that to offer the things they love for sharing in a more special way (otherwise they won’t share it and will rather gift or exchange them) to other (unknown) people. Their rejections to publish things for sharing normally appealed to they don’t trusting if «borrowers will bring it back safe after they lending it», but in fact what they more complained about is that «Sharing is special for me, i only share with whoever i have existant bonds or with less known others that i would like to have more personal bond with».

 

Categorías
Revisiones

Promos audiovisuales de Compartir

Este artigo é um resumo da experiência de uma pesquisa de videos na net (especialmente no youtube) com as palavras compartilhar, partilhar ou compartir mais (e ainda) «música, animação, tudo, etc».

Esta práctica de usar a «partilha» como eixo central da mensagem que se quer mostrar, faz que os productos audiovisuais tenham uma pressão adicional para que tenham uma alta qualidade de edição, porque a palavra «partilha» tem uma grande conexão com uma energia que todos levamos bem dentro. A «Partilha» tem uma alta qualidade conceptual em si mesma. Por exemplo, encontramos uma alta carga de significado tanto ao ver videos para crianças, como videos para adultos . Também encontramos videos que mostram uma visão de partilhar como algo mais integrado na nossa cotidianidade e sem essa polarização de criança – adulto, mas todos eles mantêm a grandeza do significado do «partilhar«. Por exemplo, e como caso bastante fora de tópico neste artigo, esta é uma fotomontagem (download nao partilhado) de um convite a «compartir una ciudad» através de fotos.

 

Compartilhar

Os audiovisuais sob o título compartilhar que procurei no youtube estão quase todos associados a uma premissa religiosa: «compartilhar é dar, amar (a jesus)». Desta pesquisa com «compartilhar» gostava de realçar este video com música feito para crianças lutadoras: E neste outro video mostra-se uma casa da rede fora do eixo, onde «se compartilha tudo»

 

Partilha

Com a palavra «partilha» torna-se mais visível a polaridade cultural histórica de associar um tipo de «partilha imaterial» para adultos para ser mais sábio (neste caso com interpretações menos religiosas, coincidindo com resultados de obras audiovisuais feitas por portugueses) e outro tipo de «partilha material» para ensinar crianças a serem eficientes. Dentro deste contexto vemos novas gerações de audiovisuais sem complexos desta polaridade, como no caso do video da casa fora do eixo, mencionada anteriormente. Podemos observar outro exemplo interessante, inclusivo e «atual» numa banda de Guimarães (Portugal) que decidou chamar-se Projeto Partilha, Canção Escolhas. Já existe um filme (trailer) que se chama «a partilha» e tem como guião a partilha de uma herencia entre irmãs que estão a morar na casa que devem vender. Também este anúncio comercial (bastante engraçado) pretende mostrar as soluções prácticas que podemos considerar para solucionar os problemas que aparecem na nossa vida quando partilhamos tudo A lembrança e intenção de reconexão com hábitos de partilha do antigamente , no contexto de uma campanha promocional privada

 

Compartir

Quando procuramos «Compartir«, aparecem mais vídeos sugestivos, e muitos mais ainda relacionados com a infância. Alguns dos vídeos mais actuais, tentam integrar estes dois mundos: o imaterial adulto e o material infantil. Este é provavelmente o melhor de todos. Experimento compartir (completo)

 

Pedagogia explícita com a partilha

As músicas ou montagens de vídeo para crianças (espontaneidade) são feitas por adultos (racionalidade), aqui numa tentativa de definir o compartir com lírica reflexiva e com grafia e música infantis Há mais videos pedagógicos com bastante vontade de ordem social. Este (e outro similar) e este (muito bom) também são mais uma fotomontagem do mesmo género. Nesta entrevista seguinte assistimos a uma explicaçao de uma pedagoga sobre a evolução das diferentes tendências de partilha que encontramos em crianças desde os 0 até os 5 Plaza sésamo é um grande ícon da pedagogia infantil, e tem vários capítulos que pretendem ensinar a «compartir melhor» de uma manera bastante racional   Destes, saliento um com especial interesse porque aprofunda o problema do receio a «vai-se estragar se emprestas»

Partilha lírica para crianças com música

Os pimpollos: Provavelmente o video mais ambicioso ou épico de todos… Este, um simpático: Todos los perros van al cielo: E este pretende desenvolver mais inteligencia de partilha nas crianças através dum delírio Outras músicas redundantes nesta vibração, como esta À parte das animações coloridas para crianças, podemos encontrar alguma música coreografiada bastante animada com pessoas reais. Ou esta música, cheia de instrumentos e mais centrada em compartir para ajudar aos mais pobres

 

Partilha adulta em músicas

Os próximos videos comunicam uma vontade de sentir ou viver esse amor que levamos dentro partilhando, sem estarem associados a uma religião. No próximo é interesante ver como o autor, além de escolher uma pessoa singular como referência dessa vontade de amar, fala de «quiero compartir con alguién» Ou este parecido, mas este já mostra «quiero compartir contigo (amarte a tí)«. De outra forma começam a ver-se vídeos mais amadores de músicas de rap ou de intervenção, tentado mostrar com recursos humildes o conceito da partilha de um modo já bastante naturalizado.

 

Partilhar amor (corpos)

No partilhar mais interno, a famosa boneca Barbie já dizia que «el amor es para compartir«, mas vamos ver um vídeo que tenta mostrar a possibilidade de poder «partilhar tudo«, incluido o corpo Entrevista a pessoal que vive no poliamor, e que estan a partilhar tudo

 

Partilha em anuncios comerciais

O conceito da partilha interessa principalmente a empresas da conectividade sejan de telecomunicaçoes em geral tipo Movistar («Compartida la vida es mas«), Claro («Compartilhar«), Tmobile («life is for sharing«) ou incluso Mastercard («compartir porque si, no tiene precio«). Este é mais no tópico da «cadena de favores«, mas é fixe e relacionado

 

Partilha em apresentaçao do projectos

Temos casos de actualidade interesante como estas apresentaçoes de projectos por començar. Este é ambicioso pero difuso («o medo de partilhar tudo«), este mais elaborado y claro («compartilhando paixoes«). Documentario de uma ruta em bicicleta por la protecçao das sementes criolhas («projecto compartilha ciclovida«), ou uma apresentaçao dum «altercambio, compartir es bueno«. O conceito de: «partilha coisas que sejan significativas e utiles para as pessoas, alem de datos da tua vida com os teus amigos» pode-se ver em videos tambem bem elaborados que como este tenta-nos mostrar o contexto da palavra «crowdlearning» donde numa entrevista com mais profundidade a uma das fundadoras nombra-se a «partilha de informaçoes, de ideais, incluso de dinero«. Compartiresvivir.org tenhe um video explicativo moito bom e uma escola marista fiz esta música e fotomontagem interesante. As redes de partilha de bems físicos construidas a través da internet mais significativas sao redes de partilha de um tipo de bems específicos só, estando um pouco isoladas entre elas (sem estar federadas com outras redes de outros tipos de bems ou serviços). Os casos de este genero mais populares sao, tal vez, as redes de hospitalidade (couchsurfing ou uma versao partilhosa da organiçaçao promotora da rede: bewelcome, etc) ou as redes de partilha de viagem em carro (blablacar, sincropool, etc). Outros organizaron uma «sharing week» com um experimento efímero chamado yocompartiria.com As redes de partilha integral, tipo redes de apoio mutuo, cooperativismo colectivista ou relacionados nao redifican-se tanto a través da internet, nem senten de usar o conceito de partilha como eixo central da sua mensagem. Estas redes sao inciativas mais presenciais para já, por isso nao producen moito video se calhar.

 

Partilha nas redes sociais

Nas redes sociais online, «partilhar» é parte importante da apresentaçao de quase todas. O mensagem esta a dizer: «Partilha como usuario datos da tua actividade vital» O simple feito de tu publicares contiudos na net daz um valor aos mantenedores do serviço. Eles conseguen a posibilidade de saber quales sao as tuas vontades, e assim, depois poden «partilhar» as tuas coisas com as grandes companhias de publicidade, as quales precisan de saber das preferencias dos usuarios para ofrecer productos que tenhen alguma certeza de que a pessoa que está a ver vai estar de algum jeito interesada no que están a intentar «vender». E por isso que os directivos da majoria das chamadas redes sociais, nao estan a partelhar contigo o desenvolvimento da aplicaçao (os softwares nao sao livres). Algumas (facebook, google+, etc) fican com os dereitos de explotaçao dos contiudos adicionados por ti. Outras como twitter preferen respeitar os teus dereitos sobre o material adicionado e inda encima animante a que «partilhes» o material livremente (deixar copiar, redistribuir, etc), porque para eles ja sao suficientes os beneficios adicionais que o seu producto ganha por a tua acçao de partilhar informaçao com outras pessoas alí. Seguindo lógicas interesadamente comerciais, estanse a criar outras redes sociais privativas tipo 6yx ou rippln onde como utilizador vas a conseguir puntos por «partilhar o teu contiudo» que logo poderas trocar para conseguir recursos materiais concretos.

 

 

Partilha em projectos globais

A um nivel global, a «partilha» trata-se moito a volta das creaçoes digitais. Por exemplo, em videos promocianais a volta de «sharing ideas«. Ou em apresentaçoes de projectos ja a funcionar para partilhar obras digitais com as creative commons, onde falan de definir uma «shared culture» ou na cultura livre. Ha outros sites com videos como no ouishare fest, este é duma oficina que tenta definir «sharing economy» Aqui um video intro valente de peers.org A compartiva (shareful), que ainda não començou a ser implementado interactivamente mas tenhe moito avançado, mas a um nivel mais práctico, tentando implementar estandares parecidos aos das creative commons, mas dirigidos para a «condiçoes e maneras para facilitar a partilha de todos os objetos» Podes (eu vou a 🙂 continuar a procurar videos mais específicos onde se mostre o «partilhar» como o seu mensagem central em material audiovisual. Se queres seguir a procura, recomendo visitares a categoria de audiovideos da wiki ou contacta conmigo, e vamos lá partilhar mais alguma coisa. beijo, ate já

 

Categorías
Poesia

Poema: BuscAmor

Al despertar
en posición fetal
todos los dias
horas antes
de levantarme
mi cuerpo se va.
Desde el pecho será que se va
porqué un nudo en la garganta hacia abajo
y otro en la boca del estomago hacia arriba
frenan a mi cuerpo que se vá.
Luego gracias a mi tercer ojo
junto al segundo chackra
reconozco que la busco..
Mi cuerpo se va a buscarla
en sueños ha estado con ella
o es que solo se acuerda del enganche
tal y como le recuerdan las endorfinas
que evitan a mi mente ahogarse de tristeza
y que exploten mis intestinos de rabia.
Si,
por la mañana,
al despertar,
todos los dias,
hace mucho demasiado ya,
mi cuerpo se va
también a la noche se va
cuando los ojos desean acompañar a la oscuridad
de arriba a abajo que se va
cuando los ojos desean acompañar a la luminosidad
de abajo a arriba que se va.
Llamame tonto, exagerado,
flipado, llorón o charlatán!!
pero aunke si, no, capuyi… no….
solo soy un chupón evolucionado
que gracias a mis ganas de amar y los impedimentos
veo cuan planta autómata soy
cuan animal en la mierda estoy
y cuan bestia humana toca hoy

Categorías
Poesia

Poema: JuntaEsencia

Juntarnos
Hablar
Celebración
Divina

Mas énfasis

Teatro
Drogarse
y decoración
de grafia
y cultos

Reunión en el salón de la casa-cueva
con ancestros animales amistados
y analogias simbólicas femeninas
por las paredes resaltan de cerca

Asi keda facil y potente fortalecida
mas ke solo con nuestros muertos
la esta sufrida de acá nuestra vida

A su opuesta nadie la kiere ni keria
pero no se afrentan a ella por opuesta
por complementa, mucho se le respeta

La enemiga no fueserá la muerte
enemistad fueserá al poco luego
kien con todo esto secta
a la muerte misma

Categorías
Revisiones

Revisión de The Mating Mind

In english, here

Primero una lista de importantes aciertos que me ha aportado, y luego una lista de fallos que le veo.

Puntos clarividentes de The Mating Mind:

Reproduction is evolution bottom-line

-Complementa la teoría de la selección sexual iniciada por Darwin para que la psicología evolutiva sea un mejor prisma con el que entender la realidad presente y pasada que la selección natural, la sociologia o la etnologia: Sexualismo > Materialismo histórico. «La discriminación sexual es la mejor prueba de que sociedades utópicas igualitarias no son posibles».

-La selección sexual es simultánea y primaria de la selección natural. Refresca la parte (primaria) de responsabilidad (sobretodo en hembras) ante las construcciones sociales patriarcales dada la (mayor) agencia sexual de las hembras (aunque tampoco lleva muy a fondo esta cuestión).

-Elección mutua (de cultura relativámente monógama como complemento necesario del Principio de Runaway) porqué prevalece el interés mutuo por relaciones de larga duración.

-Extensión explicativa del Principio de Handicap, y su analogía con el marketing y emprededurismo moderno

-La importancia del sexysmo en la formación del cuerpo humano, un aparato crackeador de sentidos afines, especiálmente la cara, mantenida con apariencia mas joven y desparasitada (como ya lo hacían los chimpancés), el pene maleable pero rigidizable (el gorila es mas violento porqué tiene el pene mas pequeño), el pene como diferenciador entre especies, curvas de mujer, la caza, las hachas, el deporte, el lenguaje, la poesía, etc. Y todo esto como ornamentos de la mente ornamental (del cuerpo primáriamente sexual)

-Humor, creatividad y amabilidad como primeros ahijados del placer, impulso primario de la nuestra privilegiada mente.

-Analogía (sugerida pero no muy consistente pero) de sexual vs social con ética vs moral

-Buena explicación de la función ambivalente de la moral para poder mentir o cubrir defectos que anuncien el no parasitismo o mayor aptitud para tener mas opciones de ser sexy (integra al gen egoísta de la sociobiología), a la vez que la moral es también método para revelar falsificaciones de señales de aptitud (refresca como tacticismos al Cooperativismo lamarck-koprotkiniano, exponiendo las faltas de una reciente teoría mas general sobre el altruismo recíproco, que sin darse cuenta el mismo la expone).

 

 

Fallos de The mating mind:

-No usa el término de sensualidad para referirse a cortejo, el mejor complemento de sexualidad. Sexysmo es mas certero que Mating Mind. Mating Mind «invade» ámbito neurológico y bioquímico en el que profundiza poco.

-Parcialismo sin ontología general. Desarrolla en su parcela, y al ir tan a fondo en ella, acaba por necesitar de un marco mayor (antropológico, físico, místico, etc) que, al igual que otros campos menores (economía, sociología, etc) prácticamente no define. No plantea el fin místico personalista del impulso de conexión sexualista localista (Ver: Dentro de la mente neolítica). También lo podría conectar mas con una sociología evolutiva = selección natural < evolución social.

-Albedrismo de sinonimizar Determinismo con Predecible (Apositivismo: Dios razón). «No esperes algo neural como predecible» dice, -Claro, pero por que tu no lo predigas no es determinista? ¿que futuro puedes predecir tu? respondo yo.

-Genial posicionamiento de la moral a modo de introducción, pero en el capítulo específico para la moral no lo ahonda nada. Aleatoriedad como mejor táctica dentro de la «estrategía» probabilistica-albedrista (zigzag de huida del conejo). Dentro de una estrategía determinista, aletoriedad sería la táctica del «dejarse llevar conectado».

-Demasiados formalismos académicos. Narra en un lenguaje accesible, pero se le nota que quiere contentar a «colegas del folclore académico» y feministas como si fueran sus «directores de tesis», mas allá de atreverse a ser mas sincero o valiente con sus pensamientos. Se contradice muchas veces por esto.

-Lo homosexual si aporta diversidad, creatividad placerosa. La constante es la evolución del artear los placeres y los sufrimientos, la reproducción es un incentivo colateral aunque en parte para algunos obligado.

-Le falta por arriesgarse a decir que la actividad sexual es la mejor obra colectiva mas artístico y social, vertedero y depuradora del sufrimiento y la violencia.

-Handicap es arte, pero sigue enfatizándolo demasiado como «muestras de desperdicio», aunque resalte mucho la palabra creatividad.

-No trata sobre la influencia del aburguesamiento de la mapaternidad, por tanto Voglen le aparece demasiado heroe, y no consigue entender-explicar mejor el capitalismo asociado a la elección de ellas (miedo a las feministas).

-No se atreve a generar constantes duales y cae en: ¿que estética narrativa es mejor la positivista o la místiconírica? 

-No profundiza en el orgasmo como pico de placer, ni lo asocia a depredación domesticada.

Categorías
Reviews

Review of Zhang’s Bipolar Fuzzy logic

«With the new geometry, bipolar quantum entanglement can be logically defined; space and time can be the result of quantum agent interaction; emotional intelligence can be included in the general category of quantum intelligence»

Good, but he later contradicts himself with:

«Bipolar reciprocal interactions created spacetime and caused all changes in the universe but not vice versa»

Wrong, why not that is nature-man, and epigenetics is the man-nature retrocausality phrased in the Participatory Anthropic Principle?. Furthermore in this sense and very curiously, he himself cites his own mistake, as he bugs on Bohr’s same mistake:

«Yin and Yang in general are the most fundamental opposites of nature, but man and woman, space and time, particle and wave, truth and falsity are not exactly bipolar opposites.»

«…This could be the reason why Bohr found causal description of a quantum process unattainable and we have to content ourselves with particle-wave complementary descriptions. It may also be the ultimate reason why modern physics so far failed to find a definitive battleground for quantum gravity.»

So oh, if man and woman or else are not governed by YinYang Bipolarity, there is no Holism in the theory, Man-Nature is anthropocentric and not reciprocal to Nature-Man. More basically speaking, he uncoherently says that there is a top down harmony, which has not the down-to-top integral expression. So very obvious fuzzy clarifying conceptual pairing as «Complex simplicity», «Effected cause», or else, have to be seen separated one from another, as he sees an equilibrium of «subjective essences» like cooperation-competition, but doesn’t want to see the pair as a reciprocal constant of «cooperative competition» and «competitive cooperation».

He also does a very poor simplification of a minimal general integral ontology of pairs, and doesn’t even consider how they scale up to triads. So, this lack of integrality, minimal scalable wholeness with its daily life models is what we try to add with this flove.org project on the top of what he and others have developed.

Categorías
Reviews

Review of The Mating Mind

The mating mind is a book from G. Miller that deepens explanations about sexual selection theory. 

Parts of it are used here in-through flove.org for explaining a neword called Sexysm.

 

Here in this page there is an accesory review for the more formal one (In spanish, see it here)

 

Were nature’s ornaments really for our eyes only?
bugs must be golden for their own purposes, not to delight our eyes or to
symbolize divine providence.


and what about flowers? (first sexual pseudo-organs) were they any nice for any animal? he contradicts himself with what he later says:

primate color vision evolved in part to notice brightly colored fruit. T h e fruit evolved to spread its seeds by advertising its ripeness with bright coloration, to attract fruit-eaters such as primates and birds. Primates benefit from eating the fruit, so they evolve visual systems attracted to bright colors. T h e fruit’s genes can reproduce only by passing through the digestive tract of a primate, so the ripe fruit’s coloration is analogous to a sexual display. The fruit competes with the fruit of other trees to attract the primate’s attention. Yet the fruit’s sexual display can have side-effects on the sexual displays of the primates themselves, as a result of the primates’ attraction to bright colors. (Eve’s offer of the apple to Adam symbolizes the overlap between the sexual displays of fruit and those of primates.) If a male primate happens to  evolve a bright red face, he might prove more attractive to females

-Our ancestors plants unimind……

….


natural selection favors efficient problem-solving. And it is supposed to be modular and specialized for solving a particular problem, because modular specialization is the efficient way to engineer things. Fitness indicators violate all these criteria.

To traditional evolutionary psychologists, human abilities like
music, humor, and creativity do not look like adaptations because
they look too variable, too heritable, too wasteful, and not very
modular. But these are precisely the features we should expect of
fitness indicators. These are fitness indicators because they favour adaptation to compelser problem-solving mate…. problems are not only practical, the «aesthetical» ones are more complex and worthy!

-He nails it correct after with:

too many scientists are mis-describing effective fitness indicators like music and art as if they were nothing more than cultural inventions or learned skills.

But if you accept that mental evolution could have been influenced by runaway sexual selection, which produces
unpredictable divergence, then you can’t expect it to be
predictable or deterministic.

-It can be deterministic while not predictable for you! he later says about zebra and birds coming from sexy jumpers dinosaurs, as he later says:

Sexual selection thus works as a natural source of serendipity in
evolution.


mutual choice renders traditional models of runaway sexual
selection irrelevant, because runaway depends on intense choosi-
ness by one sex and intense competition by the other. It depends
on sexual asymmetry.

-And then contradicts himself with the reasonable:


I think that female creative intelligence evolved through male mate choice as much as male creative intelligence evolved through female mate choice

….


In picking long-term sexual partners, our male and female ancestors both became very choosy. That choosiness is what drove sexual selection, which depends on competition to reproduce, not competition to copulate.


None of these social relationships entails any merging of genes, so they are not subject to positive-feedback processes as powerful as runaway sexual selection. But they still offer plenty of scope for all kinds of socially selected indicators to evolve. We can often use the same fitness indicators in non-sexual relationships as we do in sexual relationships

-He is over emphasizing «reprodcution is evolution bottom line…»,
and forgets that pleasure is a drive for being able to be willing to reproduce, since sex is an evolution of interaction, he forgets here to put pleasure first as he says later:


mind as a sexually selected entertainment system that plays not just upon our sensory biases, but upon our thirst for pleasure. Pleasure systems evolve for a reason: they encourage animals to do things that improve their survival and reproduction prospects


-He says it even clrearer here:


basic requirements for a fitness indicator: it should vary perceptibly, and it should be sufficiently costly that low-fitness pretenders cannot fake it.

Pleasure-giving courtship behavior is probably a better fitness indicator than courtship that merely activates sensations. Pleasure-giving is rather different from sensory exploitation. It feels better, it is better at tracking fitness benefits given to oneself, and it works better as a fitness indicator. Hot choosers that use pleasure to mediate mate choice are not more evolutionarily vulnerable than cold choosers. On the contrary, they are better positioned to let sexual selection take them off in new evolutionary directions where unknown pleasures await.

 

and then he adds a explantion of why pleasure is better than sex but it is neither god enough:

Pleasure alone is not enough. We need either more sexual competition than monogamy provides, or some interaction between sexual selection for entertainment and other sexual selection processes.


which introduces the :

We have to put the ornamental mind theory together with the fitness
indicator theory to explain why some sexual ornaments stick around.


and the sense aesthetic hacking:

 

sexual ornaments evolved to play upon the senses. Typically, males of most species like sex regardless of their fitness and attractiveness to the females, so they tend to treat female senses as security systems to be cracked.

Yet sexual choice also runs deeper than the senses. It depends on memory, anticipation, judgment, decision-making, and pleasure. Psychological preferences go beyond sensory preferences


-sex is somehow the point, ok…… the senses are ornaments……… but read it backwards and you’ll see what is more important! and how close it gets to making love to oneself!!

 

after our ancestors evolved communication systems such as language, art, and music, psychological preferences may have become crucial in sexual selection.

 

-psycology is yet one more ornament…. which even leads to making love to yourself, but only selfishly:


paper by Richard Dawkins and J o h n Krebs in 1978. They argued that when animals send each other signals, they are selfishly trying to influence each other’s behavior.

Signals are for the good of the sender, not the receiver.

-Wrong… you’ll see:


They are sent to manipulate behavior, not to convey helpful information. If the receiver’s genetic interests overlap with the sender’s interests, they may cooperate.


-so they are not only selfish mateee.. mutually selfish instead. for example, if selfish gene is the absolute lead, no need for morals, but morals are out there for a reason:


The idea that the human mind evolved as a bundle of fitness indicators does not sit comfortably with contemporary views of human nature and human society. In fact, it violates at least eight core values commonly accepted in modern society.

Variation in fitness betrays our belief in human equality.

The heritability of fitness violates our assumption that social and family environments shape most of human development.

Loudly advertising one’s fitness violates our values of humility, decorum, and tact.

Sexual status hierarchies based on fitness violate our belief in egalitarian social organization.

The idea that people sort themselves into sexual pairs by assessing each other’s fitness violates our romantic ideal of personal compatibility.

The conspicuous waste demanded by the handicap principle violates our values of frugality, simplicity, and efficiency.

The sexual choice mechanisms that judge individuals by their fitness indicators violate our belief that people should be judged by their character, not the quality of their genes.

Finally, it seems nihilistic to propose that our capacities for language, art, and music evolved to proclaim just one message that has been repeated loudly and insistently for thousands of generations: «I am fit, my genes are good, mate with me.»

A mind evolved as a set of fitness indicators can sound like a
fascist nightmare.  According to the Machiavellian intelligence theory, our minds evolved to lie, cheat, steal, and deceive one another, and the most cunning psychopaths became our ancestors by denying food, territory, and sexual partners to kinder, gender souls.

-Take it easy matee… you lack compass of pleasure, and you know that morals are also useful for faking how selfish we can «reach to be»… but only up to one point: see:

moral norms should be aimed directly against the irresponsible use of fitness indicators. We value humility precisely because many people are unbearable braggarts who try to flaunt their fitness indicators so relentlessly that we cannot hold a decent conversation. We value frugality because so many people embarrass everyone with their ostentatious displays of luxuries, and waste limited resources that others need. We
value egalitarianism because it protects the majority from aspiring despots intent on power and polygyny. These norms do not just fall randomly from the sky. They emerged as moral instincts and cultural inventions to combat the excesses of sexual self-advertisement and sexual competition

Our moral instincts may be just another set of evolved adaptations.

-You see… Morals are also natural limitations to the selfish gene! They are selfishly useful but up to one point: don’t lie too much:


Fitness is like money in a secret Swiss bank account. You may know how much you have, but nobody else can find out directly. If they ask the bank, the bank will not tell them. If they ask you, you might lie. If they are willing to mate with you if your capital exceeds a certain figure, you may be especially tempted to lie. This is what makes mate choice difficult. The supposedly low heritability of fitness was one argument against the importance of fitness indicators in sexual selection. The other problem is the potentially low reliability of fitness indicators. An animal trying to
find a high-fitness mate is in the position of an attractive gold digger seeking a millionaire. She has incentives to mate only with a male who offers high genetic or financial capital. But every male has incentives to pretend to be richer than he is, to attract more mates. What is a poor girl to do?

 

After having review you all this i must thank you very much for this other very enlightning thoughts you gave me:

 

Generally, the larger the sex difference in body size, the more polygynous the species. In humans, the average male is about 10 percent taller, 20 percent heavier, 50 percent stronger in the upper body muscles, and 100 percent stronger in the hand’s grip strength than the average female.Male
human brains average 1,440 grams, while female brains average
1,250 grams.

Let me highlight this:


Men have a slightly greater variation in I Q , producing more geniuses as well as more idiots

 

!!!

 

vision is about seeing objects, and objects tend to have edges. This edge-
detection principle has been used in most successful robot vision systems designed by humans. Now consider how a male could grab the attention of a female’s V1 system. He has to activate her edge-detectors.


One of the deepest insights from sensory bias theory is that there is always some evolutionary contingency in the design of perceptual systems. These contingencies make it impossible to predict all possible responses to all possible stimuli just from knowing what a perceptual system evolved to do. Therefore, if a new sexual ornament evolves that excites a perceptual system in a novel way, it may be favored by sexual selection in a way that could never have been anticipated. For example, biologist Nancy Burley
found that female zebra finches just happen to be attracted to males that have tall white plumes glued on top of their heads.


Their white-plume preference probably did not evolve as an adaptation, because as far as we know, ancestral finches never had white plumes on their heads. T h e preference just happened to be a latent possibility in a visual system that evolved for other purposes. I think this idea of evolutionary contingency in perceptual systems is one of the most intriguing ideas to come out of sensory bias theory. It might even work better than runaway sexual selection as a general explanation of why sexual ornaments diversify so unpredictably in different species.

there is no example of a sensory bias that leads animals to favor sexual partners that are smaller, less healthy, less energetic, and less intelligent than average. Most sensory biases are consistent with what we would expect from adaptive decision-making machinery that evolved for mate choice.


With the evolution of eyes came the possibility of visual ornaments. With the evolution of bird ears came the possibility of bird song. And perhaps, with the evolution of language comprehension abilities in our ancestors, came the possibility of sexual selection for much more complicated
thoughts and feelings expressed through language.

 

Ornamental mind

human brain as an entertainment system that evolved to stimulate other
brains—brains that happened to have certain sensory biases and pleasure systems


At the psychological level, we could view the human mind as evolved to embody the set of psychological preferences our ancestors had. Those preferences were not restricted to the surface details of courtship like the iridescence of a peacock’s tail; they could have included any preferences that lead us to like one person’s company more than another’s. The preferences could have been social, intellectual, and moral.

 

The mind as amusement park. The mind as a special-effects science-fiction action film, or romantic comedy. The mind as a Las Vegas honeymoon suite. The mind as a dance club, cabinet of curiosities, mystery novel, computer
strategy game, Baroque cathedral, or luxury cruise ship.

the mind as a sexually selected entertainment system identifies some selection pressures that may have shaped the mind during evolution.


If the human mind evolved as an entertainment system like Hollywood,
those of its features that look like military-competitive weaknesses
may actually be its greatest strengths.


Its propensity for wild fantasy does not undermine its competitive edge, but attracts enormous interest from adoring fans. Its avoidance of physical
conflict allows it to amass, quietly and discreetly, enormous resources and expertise to produce ever more impressive shows. Its emphasis on beauty over strength, fiction over fact, and dramatic experience over plot coherence, reflects popular taste, and popular tastes are what it lives on. Its huge promotional budgets, costly award shows, and conspicuously luxurious lifestyle are not just wasteful vanity—they are part of the show. Its obsession with fads and fashion do not reflect victimization by exploitative memes, but the strategic appropriation of cultural ideas to promote its own products.

Modern human culture is a vast, collaborative attempt to chart out this space of all possible stimulation, to discover how to tweak our brains in pleasurable ways.

Sexual selection explores this space of all possible stimulation. In sexual selection, traits that began as indicators tend to grow m o r e complexly o r n a m e n t a l because the sensory preferences of the opposite sex partially impose their own aesthetic a g e n d a on the indicator. Conversely, traits that originate as p u r e r u n a w a y o r n a m e n t s tend to acquire value as fitness indicators because aesthetically impressive o r n a m e n t s tend to be costly a n d difficult to produce.

Aesthetic tastes

The fitness-indicator principles are good at explaining why animals of a given species have such a strong consensus about what they like in a sexual
trait: why all peahens like the peacocks to have large, symmetric, bright, many-eyed tails. The fitness-indicator perspective explains the perfectionism and conservatism of sexual tastes within each species. It also explains why large, long-lived animals have not degenerated to extinction under the pressure of harmful mutations. On the other hand, the ornamental principles are good at explaining why animals of different species develop such different tastes: the tails that attract peahens, for example, are not turn-ons for female turkeys or female albatrosses. The ornamental perspective explains the protean divergence of sexual tastes across species over macro-evolutionary time. It also explains why sexually
reproducing life on our planet has split apart into millions of different species.


The ornamental view is especially important for appreciating the role of evolutionary contingency in shaping sexual traits, sexual selection would sooner or later havediscovered that intelligent minds similar to ours make good  courtship o r n a m e n t s a n d good fitness indicators


Birds come from sexy jumpers:

wings originated as sexual ornaments, along the following lines. Take a fairly useless dinosaur forelimb. Add a bit of color or an extra skin-flap with a novel mutation. Apply sexual choice a n d the runaway process. Result: a large surface area o r n a m e n t e d with color, available for display to the
opposite sex. Feathers make excellent sexual ornaments—they are light, flexible, a n d movable. T h e y are still used in courtship displays by male rifle-birds, w h o snap t h e m open and shut in front of awestruck females. If the male protobirds h a p p e n e d to combine their forelimb displays with energetic j u m p s during courtship, a n d if females selected for the best j u m p e r s , then the transition from a display function to an aerodynamic function would be relatively smooth. O n c e wings proved useful in other contexts such as escaping predators, then survival selection
would start shaping t h e m for flight instead of just sexual ornamentation. T h i s would have led to the well-documented proliferation of bird species well before the extinction of their dinosaur cousins 65 million years ago.

 

Categorías
News

Review of static-truth logic

STATIC TRUTH-BASED MODELS

Static truth-based logic is a reasoning that dominated most western thinking. It is a way of thinking where Truth is an unipolar and static concept. For example, «substance» was taken as the metaphysical point of departure by Aristotle formal logic; an «abstract circle» was taken as the point of departure by Hegel’s contradiction-based dialectics; «Capital» was selected as the point of departure by Marx’s historical materialism. Also «Empiric effect of an uncertainity» was selected by sofists and newtonians and later positivists-inflationists, all of them based in a «subjective mathematical truth» as proposed by Bayesian sets’ theorists.

The laws of identity (A = A), contradiction (P ¬P), and excluded middle (P∨¬P) form the 1st principle of the truth-based mathematical abstraction. Following the 1st principle, modern set theory as a foundation for mathematics and computer science requires an element in a set to be self-evident and the properties of a set to be independent of the nature of its elements. This «independence» is the same as to say: «We are truth seekers that don’t need a shred of logical dynamics for reciprocal interaction». The problem with all of these necessary metaphysical assumptions of Static truth-based logics is that without formal syntax and semantics for equilibrium and harmony, none of them cannot be regarded as a coherent logical system. So the so called formal logic can and needs to be developed further to be formal or more formal.

Static thruth-based models, despite much aesthetic effort put to it, excludes any possibility of a formal definition for the ultimate Being to reveal all beings with logically definable causality with regularity. It also doubles its uncoherent logic by claiming that the essence of such and all beings is contradiction, rivality or an independent singleness, so with this redudance finally and for sure their truths will be contradictory, not only but specially within their own laws. This tells why nihilism is unavoidable in clasical metaphysics, why God is needed as an exemplar being or the prime mover aimed to be a figure for rational-social consensus that ends any further philosophical review (as the subjective truth at a personal level also does) and why the root of a type hierarchy of all beings has to be labeled with a NULL value (i.e. void, vacuum, non-alive motion, etc).

 

Bohr

Niels Bohr, as Leibniz, were two passionate followers oy YinYang equilibrium. However, they failed in giving it a more in depth analisys.

«The viewpoint of complementarity presents itself as a rational generalization of the very ideal of causality. – Niels Bohr»

As a result on keeping attached to Static truth-based dualism (a bit like Hegel or Leibniz…), Bohr stopped short of offering logically definable causality for quantum mechanics because its proposed dualism doesn’t account for the fundamental property of Nature’s holistic bipolar coexistence in dynamic equilibrium and harmony.

Bohr, as many scientists, couldn’t accept Einstein’s stand of a «glove pair» to be in a deterministic uncertainity state, as later defined by B. Kosko at his «Fuzzy vs Probability» paper. Neither Einstein, despite appreciating it and its last emotional letter about the monism of the Love we humans feel, didn’t officially accept the holism of the Mach principle, and sarcastically defined the quantum entanglement as «spooky action at a distance» instead of seeing it as «interaction at a distance through a length», probably because he felt that proposing Earth matter has a galactic length and our human bodies having a enormous galactic lenght it was a thought too hard to swallow by humans of its time.

 

Hawking

While ether, monad, monopoles, and strings are imaginable quantum agents originated from singularity but so far untestable, one idea of him was that «In fact, in some cases individual objects don’t even have an independent existence but rather exist only as part of an ensemble of many». The problem is that he, as the others and despite being brave to align with the multiple universes theory, didn’t want to thread that connectivity further, and relied in the ambiguos, vague and suffered infinity

When Hawking declared the death of philosophy without telling what he meant by «individual» or which are the cases «where there is no need of dependance or equilibrium», his many universes are still truth-based and being-centered. Since being and nothingness share the same philosophical subjectivity root, Hawking null («a great many universes were created out of nothing») like Leibniz monad neither avoided nihilism.

Laozi

A bit of the same criticism, but in another sense, can be said for Laozi explanations of YinYang dynamics:

«The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao; the name that can be named is not the eternal name» also added to the mystery because it contradicts what Yi Jing claimed: «One Yin and one Yang are called the Dao.» Laozi would be correct if the Dao were defined as a limited truth, a linear vision as is understable in Western philosophy and science. The problem he had is that we cannot explain the eternal Dao in a limited linear static-truth interpretation, and instead it should have be defined the Dao as an holistic dynamic truth or the essence that reveals all beings because it is eternal.

Thus, we have no other option for truth seeking but to choose the holistic, equilibrium-based and logically definable YinYang bipolar dynamic interpretation, where we can also establish linear truths, only in a fuzzy greys’ scale.

 

EQUILIBRIUM-BASED TRUTH MODELS

«We need to break the gridlock»

Embracing truth-based duality leads to truth mis-management, which is proven by the fact that modern science has so far failed to find ether, monad and monopoles nor even gives beautiful explanations from Nature’s harmony. Unless being and truth can escape equilibrium or non-equilibrium, equilibrium-based and harmony-centered YinYang may be the ultimate revealing and regulating power for being and truth (The dynamic holistic truth).

Unitary bipolarity is qualified to be as the unique formal generalization of Boolean logic, bringing static bivalent truth domain to truth being in a dynamic equilibrium domain. Bipolar equilibrium-based models can be deemed as inclusive, integrative, complementary, and dynamic extensions of truth-based models for more effective modeling and decision analysis with either qualitative or quantitative data. An equilibrium-based holistic approach does not exclude but subsumes truth-based methodologies, as long as equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions are not violated. A simple YinYang bipolar dynamic equilibrium of negative-positive energy/information (n,p) finds no equivalent unitary representation in truth-based (bivalent) models.

The essence of being is a bipolar dynamic equilibrium looking for harmony. Things cause one another because Mother Nature ordained a pre-established equilibrium and harmony for everything in the universe through YinYang bipolarity, as shown by the second law of thermodynamics.

Any being, including the universe itself, is a holistic dynamic equilibrium of input-output and/or negative-positive energies/information. The negative and positive energies or the Yin and Yang also seem to be unavoidable for the regulation and unification of the multiverses.

«Dipoles are observed everywhere; particle-antiparticle (−p,+p) pairs and action-reaction (−f,+f) are believed the most fundamental elements of the universe; negative and positive energies form the regulating force of the universe or even multiple universes (Hawking & Mlodinow)»

YinYang bipolar geometry is equilibrium-based that transcends spacetime, being, and truth because particle-antiparticle bipolarity can survive bigcrunch and-or a black hole. Despite all beings and truths being subject to observation and limited to certain spacetime, with the bipolar relativity approach both realities can be much better understood.

Bipolarity may also be holding the key to the long-standing puzzles of quantum superposition, quantum entanglement, quantum biology, cognitition, and mind-matter unification. The unification of logical linearity and physical nonlinearity develop holistic bipolar dynamic models for organizational modeling with logically provable linearity soundness. So YinYang bipolar quantum entanglement can be an equilibrium-based ubiquitous regulating power of space-time, being, truth, science and philosophy.

The unification of energy and information makes energy/information conservation, regeneration and degeneration of a physical or social system mathematically computable. Finally, the unification of equilibrium with a bipolar harmony can be defined as a dynamic equilibrium with moderate oscillation and limited imbalance. A simple How-to for harmonizing can be phrased in this way:

* Apply linear division to avoid bipolar fission in a separation or avoid linear division for bipolar fission

* Control acceleration and speed in growth to avoid bipolar fission.

* Enhance balance to avoid oscillation

 

WHY STATIC TRUTH-BASED MODELS ARE NOT EVEN WRONG? WHAT TO LEARN?

Every time anyone vibrates only one of the possible polarities as a truth within a Static Truth-based model, the other polarity would tend to be linearly denied by that person, but the other pole would get quantumly reinforced to be needed to be vibrated in another side of Nature. So in a outsidish world where Static truth based models are (linearly) very propagated, this YinYang equilibrium logic should also arrive (linearly) with a higher enlighment properties for your inner yourself. So, if you embrace the holistic dynamic equilibrium approach in a world dominated by static-truth stands, you are likely to be very easily enlightened.

 

 

See more: Review-of-Zhang’s-bipolar-fuzzy-logic

 

Categorías
Literature

Spoofed poems

These are freely self-made poems, spoofing some people i learned important bits from
 
 

I don’t mean to be mathy but
I just point out at the second glove
that one which brings us flove
Light, Gravity, Power, God,
the quintessence of life,
The most powerful unseen force
that includes and governs all others,
the one,
the ultimate and only answer for a better survival
myfriend…

Albert Einstein

Curvo doblador

 

 

 

 

 

My Life film is a drama
Opposites are complementary.
The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement..
But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.
My Life film is a drama
The poet is describing facts
as with creating images
and establishing mental connections.
My Life film is a drama but if
an objectivized subjectivity
that can be unambiguously communicated
in ordinary human language,
for trying to harmonize
our position as spectators and actors
in the wider framework within which our life is set,
like flove.org tries nowadays,
that film will not be a drama.

Niels Bohr

Entangled player

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh My Lol pours water out of my eyes
I am still the most studied person…
and i still don’t know myself well.
Even any thing being full of gods
while elementary at the same time
and my body being healthy,
my mind resourceful
and my nature docile,
I still don’t know myself well.
I suppose it will be about time
that people will realize
that it is an ocean of air
what excites our earth of fire.
In this sense i just hope
not needing of more words
for not ending in a blame
our rivers as we fail.

Thales

Elemental taler

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brothers & Sisters
Now i wanna print you something
Life is an unfoldment,
the further we travel
through us and ourselves
the more prepared we will be
for the more truth
we could comprehend

Hypathia

Astral archaelogist

 

 

 

 

 

‘That’ and ‘This’ give birth to one another.
When there is no more separation
it is called being one with the Tao.
What happens in one side
cretaes patterns at the other side.

Chung Tzu

Autaor

 

 

 

YinYang Equilibrium is the only posible first realization of matter,
and it still is how the living microscopic entanglements effects

scale up into our macroscopic world.

Atomists and Relationists understimated Bipolar equilibrium
Nor Lao si nor others brought decent logics and algebra to it.
Philosophy and its childs are from the beginning ill about that.
Some close ones, Bohr and Leibniz didn’t bring it to where i did,
but what flove.org is doing it is even more integral than us&me.
What the Iching should have told with «The 1 is unknowable» is
to focus in the relation of 2 to get to know some bits of the 1.
I have many formulas & predictions of that but
now is time for more philosophy in the streets
up to gaming nations competitive cooperation
while enjoying fuzzy conversations with robots.

Wen Ran Zhang

Equilibrist Modulator
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

So amazing this choir of socks,
shoes, shirt, skirt, undergarments,
earth, sky, suns, and moons.
No wonder I too, now, sing all day.
because if any organism fails to fulfill its potentialities, it becomes sick.

Rabia James

Arabic english

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unity and complementarity constitute reality.
You either need atomizing
and not atomizing what should not be atomized.

Werner Heisenberg

Maybe probably

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuziness is a type of Deterministic Uncertainity.
Theorems of clasical maths are not fuzzy.

Bart Kosko

Surely fuzzy

 

 

 

 

 

 

As any matter o master
the propensity to unite
is the human experience
our soul is better having.
Venite, adoremus, research
but after mastering the winds
the waves, the tides and gravity,
by shattering our mental categories
burning layers that mold the truth,
we will explain the evolution of love
for giving us all further hope.
Trust! in the slow work of God.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Supermindfulness

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global culture
gets enlightened
by consciouss
primary knowledge
beyond sensations.
Centering of the Self
inner ecstasy of mind,
our resourcefulness
as in unity with god.
Lightly, it’s all about
Rhythmic Balanced Interchange
between all opposites.
Humans hate and greed
selfishness and free will
where there for us learning
that we can’t escape or avoid
an universe who first loves

Walter Russell

Lightning mate

 

 

 

I should have called fuzzy communication

is more complementary than dual fuzzyness.

A person is only a particular kind of general idea,

all monads serve as bridges of diversity.

The greater the subject the easier the triads:

1 existing independent of anything else…

2 concieved of being 1 relative to another 1, reaction, else..

3 mediates, whereby 1 and 2 are brought into relation.

All the evolution we know of proceeds from the vague to this kind of definites

taught by practical jokes, mostly cruel, but taboos were first there

That, however, describes the method of our great teacher,

Experience.

C.S. Pierce

Trigonocommunicator

 

 

All matter
–whether human bodies or quanta–
intends to be self-aware,
then a concioussness
needs to express images
for better feeling
the lovely natural waves and signals
that are just out there within us
with all the pasts at hand
to be deciphered
through the shared holographic processes
that life is.

Edgar Mitchell

Mooned Soul

 

 

 

Time or motion have to be, as us, alive.
As Wheeler said: «an incoming bit of light now determine the indeterminate path it took billions of years ago»
Hence Biophysics needs a Biocentrist view
where Time & Space are parameters,
in our linear stream of consciousness,
while Death is a simply a break.

Robert Lanza

Biocentrist explainer

 

 

 

The more we feel
the more amazing it seems
our own life we reveal.
A reciprocal relation
in a quantum lineage
determines π values
principles and laws.
Earth life got complex
looking at ourselves
noticing the sun
then the sky
now we fly

Karl Coryat

Bioexcentricity matters

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nature combines Planck quoins [E=n.hv]
to form the standard model of 2d forces and 3D Particles
that ultimately combine over time
[through charge interactions]
to form the periodic table of elements
and the compounds and complex macro-molecules
[amino, peptides, proteins & RNA/DNA]
of LIFE itself…
Cambrian explosion just continued
what was already there

Diego borges

Open Euplotidist

 

 

 

 

 

 

The “global harmony” dataset
highlights the subtle, yet considerable,
significance
of human gatherings for peace.
The physical world feels those effects
so there is a form of interconnection
existing between human minds
and physical matter
which ties them as one.
We are showing that
with pseudo-random generators
that highlight some order
due to some human events

Global-mind.org

PsiQ app

 

 

 

 

I wish it to be your delight
a surprise like in the openning
of the center of the universe
inside our minds.
Intelligence gets systematized
by learning from, and being respected by
his adored another because…
people like more to be loved
than being dominated.
So fluid emotional and sensitive dialogs
that are relationally connective
is the best technology we could bare,
within our human form as we know of.
Limits serve for tunning scopes
as a reflective awareness imitation
or mind’s moral reinforcement
of some of its own recognized patterns
within the morphic resonance shade
through brain’s water megamolecules
that wet quantum decoherence reflects
in this reciprocal self-foundational set.

Ben Goertzel

Singular transpersonalist

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It has been called samadhi,
enlightenment,
non-dual experience,
and many other names.
I will call it
living deeply
or transcendence
or even better
Unconditional love
from the common base ground
generally loving
as we try to reach it.
Generally speaking, I don’t call intellingence
to any try that doesn’t love me

Julia Mossbridge

Trascendent lover

 

 

 

I don’t like god cos tends to be an outer one
in the calibrating of stabilized forms islands
in the vast ocean of uncertainties speckled.
Instead my vow goes to practical theories
trying to define the politics of accompaning
care, scruple, cautiousness, attention,
contemplation, hesitation and revival.
The, this, reality that resists
waking up as it was morning
beyond the social mourning.
Society gets endured with machines
that represent our culture and wishes
forces that if get cuted enough
could calm the tiger nature for us is.

Bruno Latour

Acting in the network

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a Life unit
reciprocally trascending
in viewable 3d space-time
and in an unviewable paralel
3d scalar time-space.If planets were alive
and planets were stars
and stars were planets
much, much closer to us.

Dewey Larson

AstroReciprologist

 

 

 

 

 

Within apparent infinite combinations
creativity does simplicity to complexity
combining the poles of art and maths.

Edward Frenkel

Artistic of maths

 

 

 

You can’t reverse time
but for stars feeding sake
our plasma will order it more positevely.
Noone can’t charge if not imploding first
we will vow together to the sun
DNA will fully implode when we’ll die
and bliss is a partial sensation of that.
The implosion that precedes expansion,
a time reversal try looking for more order,
is a centripetal force causing negentropy
through isotrop nondestructive transition of charge
seeable as brain wave frequencies geometries print,
applying my equation to it
draws the golden ratio cascade
that accesses the blackhole
for distributing the charge
sacring our mate, the space.

Dan Winter

Centripetal Cascadist

 

 

 

 

Life in society is though
vitalism is understimated
lost in the supermarket
i found the life systems.
More integrality i want
with hugo i did eco law
with marc who knows?!

Fritjot Capra

Social Lifer

 

 

 

The soul travelling all back
through all the roots of humanity
is and-or will be the friendly Alien.
More UFOs than our galactic thoughts
that are hijacking the body of an ape,
i don’t know if there are…
Just perhaps we’ll want to be the mushroom
which has been there for bilions of years
that now when we unite it into being in us
we become a wormhole in the time wave
an openness to further connectivity
with the more evolved intelligences
that are and have always been
yet unseen there
yet to be felt
yet to be net
Bet!

Terence McKena

YoUFOlogist

 

 

 

 

Earthing is sourcing
the juice that feeds us

Dr Mercola

Grounded MammoGaian

 

 

 

 

 

In: A ^ B ^ C
an increase of A
doesn’t decrease much C.
So if so it’s better a multiverse…
than 20+ dimensional strings just in this.
M-Theory are ideas, gravity is interesting.
To the Slits & Cats ones i have to say that:
To a radiated entangled pair
we’ll go when we’ll die.
My theory is that inverting the geometrical patterns
of the slow increase of the early universe
we will see bits from before the BigBang,
so we could imagine how this aeon could end
(…probably as a blackhole due to a entropy retrograd process
caused by higher thermodynamic equilibrium in our linear time…)
and how a next one could begin from this,
and how close is to our 3d making on the 2d.
The chipest observable alive matter i am for
are microturbules tighting up all the brain,
but as a scientist i am, i want to know more.

Roger Penrose

A rose made pen

 

 

 

 

The multiverse is the unknowable of our unknown
while we try to known that ToE needs a quaternion.
I brigthed teleology a bit but i will not integral it

Let me try to give a good explanation
We revealed 4 machines of a fabric.
The machines serve us for our time,
but we didn’t worked them glued yet
and the glue is important because
will show us the fabric fine tunner.
Soh, at this point is interesting to remind that
ontological meassurements beyond aparatus
are key for being optimistic about the fabric,
so we need the third layer of a multiverse in it.

David Deutsch

Quaternioner multiversalist

 

 

 

 

The brain is embodied
as the body is enworlded.
Social are rationalities on Agency, speech, memory, intention, feelings
that are broad in the formation of relationships
between species members and other mates.
I would monument social as the achademy of understanding
that as human advanced organic life we are
further threading of that we want
to realise more our bits
as in and as the whole.

Tim Ingold

Antroporelationist

 

 

 

We take the star fire
uterine flames
to light up
the astral light
sun of the horns.
Such a high of
astral fire brings
andor fired astro.
Fire that astros fresh,
astros that fire earths.
Thisthat is merged
gaiactic man
woman wombsion
here on earth in a
menstrual female.
Tastes as gold,
tells this height
where men and women
are diverse and edgy
up to celebrate next.
The family unites
assembly is set
women and men
will find a tale

– An u

Summer temperaturer

 

 

 


A human is a museum of natural history
and individual variability is crucial to evolution.
We broadly dress pleasure fun or other joys
with memories, emotions and social meanings,
mainly conveyed by language
while renewable addictions.
Drug, food, sex, gambling & generosity
like the creative dolphin masturbating
with live wriggling eel around its penis
up to an our more derived bonovism
or like any heroin and every orgasm
and never not just oxytopamine,
because there are even more in
What i mean is that…
non-reproductive sexual behaviour,
contributes to the social context
in which offspring emerge.
Oxytocine, dopamine, serotonin
and more have, do and will tell.

— Compass of pleasure

please enjoy!

Categorías
Reviews

Review of Biocentricity

See biocentricity.net, where there are very good explanatory texts and specially short videos of them. It gets deep in describing the theory, framing physics problems that could be better resolved, but it is very weak at proposing implementations. The fine tunning also need and have our life expressed in simplified main categories (lists of 2, 3 and then many more infinite to our perception capabilities but not infinite themselves) where artificial intelligence (the proposed but non specified implementation) will endure them.

«Life’s possible role as a fundamental agent in the configuration of the observed universe, therefore, ought to be seriously considered.»

«Life creates the universe, rather than the other way around»

First he refers to Life as a complex or biological life, and in the second he refers to Life as the fine tunner without implying reciprocity. It will be politer (non rival) to say: Our life shows the fine tunning that is posibly creating other universes or Lifes abroad.

 

«As observers, we have no control over when or where such potentials, large or small, become realized.»

We have no control, but they are being realized (evolution shows a pattern).

 

«A unique beginning out of many possible beginnings, rather than the universe beginning in one specific way that was «fine-tuned» all along.»

A uniqueness enough fine tunned to be able to reach This. But yes, it wasn’t manipulated by some free willers in the middle of the journey. Such interventions were also fine tunned.

 

«Intelligent, directed creation necessarily calls for complex beginnings. No complex creator or designer is necessary in a biocentric universe.»

The fine tunning is the more complex event. You can call the fine tunner a Person, despite abuses of monotheistic religions with the word God and the finne tunner being in a reciprocal relation with us. (Karl the theorist, is a declared atheist, he has put his prejudices here in this stand)

Complex and and simple are not «bad» or «good»… All is a simplified complexity.

 

«The universe, like π, can be understood most elegantly as a relation.»

Specially because no matter or form is separated from the rest. «Reciprocal» ( as in PAP or Interactus) hits this same stand more beautifully.

 

«Biocentricity predicts that the entire universe outside of the Solar System will be found to be effectively sterile.»

It is alive, we may be a part of bigger life that is relationing with us for giving birth to paranormal things here in earth, out of the solar system within this galaxy or others and even in other universes (Family lineaging theory from the multiverse theory from David Deutsch)… so it doesn’t need to be sterile.

 

 

Addon for interactus

«The universe is incredibly complex not because it just is, but rather, because the biological organisms observing it have become incredibly complex. The observable universe is unique to our particular lineage of biology, including the earliest observations in the universe’s history.  Perhaps this manifests to us in the form of this bizarre anomaly. If so, what an amazing clue it is!

Biocentricity can account for inanimate objects functioning as «observers»: Particle detectors, digital cameras, and the like are information-seeking tools that are designed and built by biological beings. There are multiple observers in the world, but they all observe the same world. Doesn’t this point to a world that is external and independent of observers?

Yes, it does! Which is why, for thousands of years, an external, observer-independent world has been assumed. But Einstein’s relativity, followed by the discovery of quantum phenomena and its bizarre experimental findings, have given us reason to question this assumption.

It is certainly true that everyone experiences the same course of events in the world. In the biocentric view, this makes perfect sense because all biological observers are directly linked, genetically as well as through a continuous chain of reproductive physical interactions between parent and offspring, and thereby constitute a kind of common observer — a superorganism that is correlated to one and only one course of universal events. (This is explained in Part 4 of our video series.)

Just as the universe is 100% consistent for one individual, so must it be 100% consistent for all observers from the same biological lineage.We see those galaxies today; we do not see them five or ten billion years ago. We say they are billions of years old, or more accurately we are seeing them now as they were billions of years ago. The galaxies are analogous to individual electron positions being observed when we look for them within the electron cloud.

CMB is an observable phenomenon that can be interpreted as evidence for a real Big Bang 13.7 billion years in the past — but only if you assume that matter and energy are absolute and independent of observation, and therefore pre-existed in the same form prior to the emergence of life.

There is one tantalizing fact about the CMB, however: When the CMB data (rigorously interpreted and corrected) is transformed into a large-scale map of the whole sky,
the fluctuations in the temperature of that background radiation — originating over 13 billion light-years away — eerily line up on opposite sides of the ecliptic,
the plane of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. Although such distributions were predicted to be purely random across the sky, statistical studies show that the pattern is not a result of chance (to within 99.9% confidence). Even stranger, there is no such correlation of the CMB with the plane of our galaxy, or any other astronomical plane. While the mapping of the CMB in general was a huge success for cosmology, this particular unexplained fact verges on embarrassing and has been dismissed by some as an error. But the data is robust, with dozens of researchers over the past seven years searching for an overlooked factor and coming up empty.

There may be a biocentric explanation: The first biologically observed astronomical motion almost certainly involved what we now call the Sun, moving across (what we now define as) the same plane of the sky. Our modern observations of the deepest reaches of space may be constrained to be consistent with all previous observations»